The WazirX lawsuit provides legal insights on cryptocurrency restructuring.
From operational issues to regulatory ambiguity, the Indian cryptocurrency business has seen its fair share of hurdles. The ongoing reorganisation of WazirX marks a significant turning point in the relationship between digital assets and the law.
The Singapore High Court’s handling of creditor categorization, procedural requirements, and the crucial role that creditor votes play in deciding the success of restructuring attempts are the main topics of this article’s analysis of the legal dynamics of the WazirX case
. The Singapore High Court’s decision establishes important legal precedents for creditor categorization, company restructuring, and the changing legal landscape around bitcoin assets. It also emphasizes how important the judiciary is to guaranteeing a fair allocation of resources and giving legitimacy to a proposed plan.
Context of the case
One of the biggest cryptocurrency exchanges in India, WazirX, suffered significant losses after the North Korean hacker collective Lazarus stole $230 million worth of cryptocurrencies in a July 2024 onslaught. Lazarus was jointly blamed for the attack by the governments of South Korea, Japan, and the United States. WazirX responded by submitting a scheme of arrangement to the Singapore High Court, outlining a plan to disperse the remaining assets to platform users and other creditors. This plan, which was put forth in accordance with Section 210 of the Singapore Companies Act, acts as a legal tool that permits financially troubled businesses to restructure debts while being closely monitored by the Court.
Examining the proposed restructuring plan of WazirX
WazirX’s planned restructuring plan seeks to give creditors—especially users—a methodical way to recover their losses. Net Liquid Platform Assets (NLPA), rebalanced to meet claims, will be distributed to creditors in the form of bitcoin in the scheme’s initial distribution, which is anticipated to occur in April 2025. According to the NLPA’s January 17, 2025, valuation of about $480.9 million, this initial payment is expected to recover 85% of user portfolios by July 18, 2024.
Recovery tokens (RTs), which reflect each creditor’s portion of claims, will be distributed pro rata. Funded by future WazirX operating income, recovered assets, and the sale of illiquid holdings, these RTs will be redeemable over 36 months.
The Singapore High Court supervises procedural fairness and creditor voting to guarantee the scheme’s sustainability, with a focus on transparency, creditor involvement, and equitable recovery.
WazirX will have enabled one of the quickest, most equitable, and most legally enforceable recovery and distribution procedures in cryptocurrency history if the plan is put into action within the anticipated time range. Voting in favour of the plan is a wise decision for WazirX users looking for resolution because it guarantees effective asset distribution through a transparent and structured recovery strategy.
Feasibility of the scheme and creditor classification
Before presenting WazirX’s restructuring plan to creditors, the Singapore High Court evaluated its viability and made sure it included enough details. According to legal requirements, restructuring plans must provide a practical recovery route in order to preserve judicial effectiveness and prevent deceiving creditors. Some users questioned WazirX’s motives, raising concerns about possible abuse of procedure. Citing the company’s attempts to look into the breach and put in place an open asset distribution system, the Court found no indication of bad faith.
Since financial disclosure is essential to any restructuring, the Court asked WazirX to provide enough openness, which included a comparison of the scheme and liquidation. WazirX’s promise to provide audited financial data before to the creditors’ conference pleased the court. For the advantage of its creditors, many of whom are tiny cryptocurrency investors, it accepted procedural changes to allow for wider participation in the voting process that is set for the upcoming weeks.
Lessons from the FTX fiasco
However, in order to provide consumers a chance to share in the exchange’s future gains and asset recoveries, WazirX has resorted to offering 85% of its money in tokens and recovery tokens.
Important regulatory lessons for India can be learnt from the divergent reactions to bitcoin insolvencies. The risks of an unregulated cryptocurrency market are highlighted by the FTX scandal, which has saddled customers with substantial delays and legal costs while only retrieving a small portion of their holdings. On the other hand, WazirX’s reorganisation, which was directed by the Singapore High Court, shows how important a clear, legally defined structure is for guaranteeing prompt and fair asset distribution.
The main lesson for India is obvious: a strong legal and regulatory framework for the bitcoin industry must be established immediately. These policies ought to put asset preservation first through appropriate custody guidelines, guarantee transparent procedures for court-supervised restructuring, and establish stringent oversight to stop poor management. In the rapidly changing world of digital assets, India must immediately improve market stability, safeguard users, and encourage responsible innovation.
Disclaimer and Risk Warning
Cryptomantr does not endorse or is responsible for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The image used in this article is for informational purposes only and is provided to us by a third party. cryptomantr should not be held responsible for image copyright issues. Contact us if you have any issues or concerns. Readers should do their research before taking any actions related to the company.